Similar Posts

3 Comments

  1. Martin is incredibly good at keeping track of all his variables–which is one reason why it takes him so long to get a book out. Yes, the minutae can be overwhelming if you’re focusing on it–but for me, whenever a new Martin book (or short story) comes out, I read through it as quickly as I can, getting the basic idea for what happens in the story. Then, I re-read at least once (usually lots, lots more) picking up the details and allusions to the wider legends/history that I missed on the first run. To me, that’s what makes his books so enjoyable; I can re-read with just as much gusto as I read the first time, and get something new out of each re-reading.

    Also, you’re right. His characters are gripping, compelling, and dynamic. For example, Jamie Lannister has turned out to be one of my favorite characters–and at the beginning of aGoT, he was the one I wanted to see skewered. I disagree though about secondary characaters; I think a number of characters that hang out on the fringe of the story are useful in a variety of ways. The trouble with Martin is, a character that seems secondary might, in fact, end up being a POV character later on (like Davos the Onion Knight); or, one of those secondary characters turns out to be of major importance to the story (like Barristan the Bold).

    Martin’s distinctive style, I think, comes from his years of working in TV and Hollywood; he’s able to adapt screen-image and POV shifting to writing, but isn’t about the usual Hollywood trite. Good people sometimes die unjustly and bad people get ahead; that’s the way the real world works. But, I get the feeling from Martin that there’s more than that–the magic and the heroic and the legendary that are, at the moment (as of the end of A Feast for Crows), just beginning to emerge into the main, have something to do with a larger concern for life and the world.

    I hope you really come to love this series. I think he’s one of the best writers of fantasy out there right now. (P.S.–I’m a friend of Karens, she asked me to give you some of my thoughts on GRRM)

  2. Thank you for your comments, Hermit. I think what I was meaning about the second level characters (in reference to the family) was that each of the Stark children has a very distinct personality. For example, even if you missed the header you would never think Arya’s chapter was Sansa’s, even when they were together at the beginning of the series. Their outlook on life is completely different, and I appreciate that. They each have their own part to play.

    Davos and Baristan started out more like third level (or further down than that), just parts of lists of names, until they surfaced again later on with real parts to play of their own.

    I finished book three today. I’m taking a brief vacation before starting Four! There’s a bit of a build-up in my TBR pile.

Comments are closed.