Similar Posts

4 Comments

  1. The POV issue. Hmmm…

    I’ll stop by to read that. It’s something I stuggle with myself (as a “writer”).

    I’m surprised to hear an editor who doesn’t have a problem with omnicient. I personally don’t either; but many, MANY people don’t like it. And I understand why.

    I’ll be back!

  2. I’ll be interested to see how many people mention POV, either pro or con. I actually had forgotten it was written in omniscient until I read a few other posts today.

    I generally find too many POV characters (when an author is writing in 3rd limited) definitely distances me from the main character. One book I read had 13, I think it was.

    The other thing to note, I’ve read some books that have a clear, limited 3rd, and I still don’t feel connected to the character.

    I agree I didn’t feel as connected with Packer or Panna as I would wish, but closer than in probably 80 percent of the books I’m reading these days.

    Becky

  3. As I’ve been reading Bryan’s book, the omnicient POV at first threw me. But I think it’s because it’s been so long since I’ve read it in a contemporary novel. My first reaction was to point my finger and say, “Hey, he did it why can’t I?”

    I love omincient. As long as the writer keeps striaght who’s VP we are in. Bryan’s done that. I never wonder, even when we are in the fish’s vp.

    I say well done! And I’m glad to took the risk to do it.
    Jackie Castle

Comments are closed.